Biopsy Needed for Dx: A mammographic report of "suspicious microcalcifications" warrants a stereotactic (nonsurgical) biopsy to definitively diagnose the abnormality. This is categorized by radiologists as a bi-rads 4 abnormality, which should be listed on the report. These are found to be cancerous approximately 15-30% of the time.
Answered 4/8/2020
5.9k views
Suspicious: Microcalcification is one of the radiologic findings in breast carcinomas. The lesion can be further investigated by needle aspiration of the cells and/or biopsy so that the cells and/or tissue may be examined by a pathologist for definitive diagnosis. It is important for your sister to keep follow-up appointments to investigate the matter.
Answered 4/5/2012
5.9k views
Yes biopsy best: Microcalcification can be a sign of breast cancer. There are however many calcification of the breast that are benign. Malignant type calcifications are usually tightly grouped, very small and heterogeneous in configuration. If a good mammographer is suspicious as to a group of calcifications they should be biopsied. I have seen cases of false negative MRI of breast with malignant calcification.
Answered 1/10/2015
5.9k views
Yes, that: can be a sign of cancer. It needs to be biopsied. About 70% of the time that suspicious findings(BIRADS 4) are biopsied, it turns out to be benign.
Answered 5/14/2018
3.9k views
6 doctors weighed in across 3 answers
4 doctors weighed in across 3 answers
7 doctors weighed in across 4 answers
A doctor has provided 1 answer
90,000 U.S. doctors in 147 specialties are here to answer your questions or offer you advice, prescriptions, and more.
Ask your question