Depends: It is all about risk benefit. If there is no symptoms and collateral a are adequate, i would not see any additional benefit from rib resection.
Answered 1/8/2015
4.7k views
Probably not.: Acute subclavian vein thrombosis is treated by anticoagulation, and if the clot is due to tos, first rib resection is recommended to prevent recurrence or in anticipation of placing a stent into the subclavian vein. In your case, with chronic DVT and collaterals, there is no need for first rib resection. However, you have a potential for chronic stasis in you arm. You should see a vas. Surgeon.
Answered 6/10/2014
4.7k views
3 doctors weighed in across 2 answers
5 doctors weighed in across 3 answers
3 doctors weighed in across 2 answers
10 doctors weighed in across 2 answers
5 doctors weighed in across 2 answers
90,000 U.S. doctors in 147 specialties are here to answer your questions or offer you advice, prescriptions, and more.
Ask your question