A member asked:

I have a furuncle boil, does this mean i have mrsa?

3 doctors weighed in across 2 answers
Dr. Joel Gallant answered

Specializes in Infectious Disease

Not necessarily: No, boils and furuncles existed long before there were antibiotics to become resistant to. However, MRSA is a common cause of boils these days. It's helpful to get a culture of the pus if possible, so you'll know whether it's MRSA or not. This could affect the choice of therapy if it's decided that you need antibiotics, either for this boil or for a future episode.

Answered 6/10/2014

5.8k views

Thank

No: You have to culture the wound and see if it is mrsa.

Answered 1/25/2016

4.9k views

Thank

Related Questions

A member asked:

What is the difference between MRSA and boil?

A doctor has provided 1 answer

A member asked:

What are the differences between MRSA and a boil?

A doctor has provided 1 answer

A member asked:

Are MRSA lesions / boils that are unopened contagious?

A doctor has provided 1 answer