A member asked:

If you are told your cancer free and have taken chemo pills why would you need radiation

5 doctors weighed in across 2 answers

Past experience: "cancer-free" is a poor choice of words when you are still receiving therapy. We never know when the last cancer cell is gone. A better term would be "no evidence of cancer". With many cancers, we know from experience that without radiation the risk of cancer returning is higher, even when there is no evidence of cancer after chemo. Hence the recommendation for radiation.

Answered 10/30/2016

4.9k views

Thank

Microscopic disease: Depending on the type of cancer, any combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy may be needed to give the best chance of cure. Radiation therapy helps with local control of either macroscopic (for example, you see it by imaging or the surgeon couldn't safely remove it all) or microscopic disease (its there, but can't detect it).

Answered 11/2/2015

4.9k views

Thank

Related Questions

A member asked:

How frequently is cancer responsive to chemo/radiation?

4 doctors weighed in across 2 answers

A member asked:

Are chemo and radiation ever performed together for cancer?

A doctor has provided 1 answer

A member asked:

If a testi is found to have cancer, can chemo or radiation be used?

4 doctors weighed in across 2 answers