A member asked:

Does minimal-access aortic valve replacement reduce the incidence of postoperative complications?

11 doctors weighed in across 3 answers

Not proven (yet): Minimally-invasive heart surgery, including for aortic valve replacement, has not been proven to reduce postoperative complications in randomized studies of both approaches. The one important exception is postoperative pain and immobility; the minimally-invasive approach allows patients, on average, to be pain-free sooner, and become active and return to work, quicker.

Answered 9/28/2016

6.2k views

Thank

Similar risks: Minimally invasive avr has similar risks to the standard procedure. The minimally invasive procedure offers a faster recovery and improved cosmetic results.

Answered 1/27/2016

5.5k views

Thank
Dr. Jon Spiers answered

Specializes in Thoracic Surgery

Maybe: While not proven, it would appear that a smaller incision should be less painful. However, never choose the size of the incision over the quality of the work. Who would want a painless but inadequate treatment? We have excellent means for controlling pain. I suggest you express these concerns and explore them with your surgeon.

Answered 9/19/2013

4.9k views

Thank

Related Questions

A member asked:

How dangerous is an aortic valve replacement?

A doctor has provided 1 answer

A member asked:

Aortic valve replacement done with pig or fake one?

A doctor has provided 1 answer

A member asked:

What should I do at home after aortic valve replacement?

4 doctors weighed in across 2 answers

A member asked:

What problems could occur after aortic valve replacement?

5 doctors weighed in across 2 answers

A member asked:

What happens during, and after an aortic valve replacement?

5 doctors weighed in across 2 answers