A member asked:

What are the pros and cons of a hip replacement for someone whose 17 years old?

2 doctors weighed in across 2 answers
Dr. Steven Sheskier answered

Specializes in Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery

Well: Pro: less pain, improved motion Con: can wear out/loosen requiring future surgery(s) that become more difficult to perform,infection (take antibiotic before dental etc.) can dislocation in certain positions, Consider alternatives to hip replacement such as pelvic osteotomy, and hip fusion. Definitely seek more that one opinion regardless. Good luck.

Answered 9/29/2016

3.8k views

Thank
Dr. Steven Warren answered

Specializes in Family Medicine

Ask the surgeon: Usually at 17 years of age you do not need a replacement. If you have a diagnosis which requires a hip replacement such as after a non healing or mal healing hip fracture, or a congenital deformity plus you are having significant pain limiting your function then having a hip replacement may make sense The cons are that you will need surgery again several times during your life and there are risk

Answered 9/29/2016

3.8k views

Thank

Related Questions

A member asked:

How can I best take care of a 90 year old woman that needs a hip replacement?

3 doctors weighed in across 2 answers