Depends: Prior mammograms for comparison are critical. Also depends on whether this is a screening versus diagnostic mammogram. Likely you will need additional x-rays and/or ultrasound, possibly biopsy. This needs to be evaluated by a doctor.
Answered 8/16/2013
6k views
Biopsy: We use a grading system to categorize abnormalities on mammography. "suspicious" means that it is a bi-rads 4 category, necessitating (nonsurgical) biopsy for definitive diagnosis. If this was seen on mammography and ultrasound, we usually guide the needle by ultrasound. While this is very anxiety-provoking, those abnormalities deemed "suspicious” are cancerous less than 30% of the time.
Answered 7/5/2012
6k views
U/s then biopsy: If the mammogram is "suspicious", then a biopsy is indicated to establish a diagnosis. 80-85% will still end up benign. In almost all cases the sampling should be by needle (core) biopsy. In general, one shouldn't go to the or without a diagnosis. An u/s may see the lesion and guide the bx. If not, then a stereotactic bx can be done. All are office procedures best done by a breast surgeon.
Answered 3/29/2012
5.9k views
Mass: Probably ultrasound, and if confirmed on ultrasound, the radiologist can perform an ultrasound guided core biopsy to establish a diagnosis. If not seen on ultrasound, a core biopsy can be performed by the radiologist with stereotactic guidance.
Answered 7/9/2014
3.9k views
Biopsy: If you truly have a suspicious mass on mammogram, the next step should be a biopsy. Talk with your doctor about who should do this. Good luck!
Answered 4/24/2015
3.9k views
A doctor has provided 1 answer
6 doctors weighed in across 3 answers
A doctor has provided 1 answer
4 doctors weighed in across 2 answers
90,000 U.S. doctors in 147 specialties are here to answer your questions or offer you advice, prescriptions, and more.
Ask your question