Root canal... In a short term, root canal can be a cheaper option. However, it puts the same tooth in risk for another infection, possible fracture, if not properly restored. Sometimes dental implants can be a better long term solution. So many factors come in play when making a treatment recommendation. Given other conditions are the same, I would try a root canal first on my own tooth.
Short vs long term. In the short term, a root canal is cheaper. In the long term it is almost always more expensive... Especially when considering the high likelihood that it will have to be treated with a new crown at some point due to recurrent decay or extracted and replaced with an implant due to decay or fracture. There are very few circumstances where root canal therapy ends up less expensive in the long term.
Depends. A molar which has been treated with root canal therapy will also require a core buildup or possibly a post and a crown. If the periodontal condition is good to excellent then this may be your best option. However if the tooth is severely broken down, has already had a root canal once before, and has periodontal involvement then the prognosis may not warrant the expense. Go implant for long term.
The Better Question. The better question is, "what would be the best long term solution for my particular dental situation? " and the answer is best given by an experienced and qualified dentist who can actually examine you and see your x-rays, along with knowing your complete medical and dental history. Discuss the pros and cons of each treatment plan along with the long term prognosis and then decide what is best.
Root Canal is Less. Although you are asking a direct question the answer is not. The real question I think you are asking is the least expensive way to solve the problem. If the tooth is restorable and periodontally sound the infection is best treated at the least cost by root canal treatment. If the above is not the case root canal treatment may not be an effective choice and extract/implant replacement may be best.
Root Canal Therapy. A root canal will usually be more affordable then an implant. Once again other factors come into play. Will there need to be crown lengthening done on the tooth? Are the roots healthy? Does the tooth have furcation involvement? I would need more information to give you a solid answer.
Root Canal. Short answer is a root canal. Of course a tooth that has a root canal often needs other work as well, such as a crown.
Root Canal Less $$. Root canal treatment is by far the first solution to an abscessed tooth. It is least expensive then an implant, even adding the buil-up and crown cost. If the extructural strenght of the tooth is poor, increasing the chance for root fracture in the future, than an implant would be a better choice. In dentistry we have more than one way to solve a problem, to acomodate your cost range.
Root canal. Try to save the tooth if a root canal is affordable. The dental implant will usually cost more as there is different cost such as the extraction of the tooth, bone grafting, dental implant, abutment and the crown.
Individual situation. It shouldn't be which is cheaper, but which is better in the long run for you and which will give you the best service. If one's natural tooth is easily restorable after a root canal and has a good long term prognosis, the root canal is the way to go. If the natural tooth has a marginal prognosis after root canal, the implant should be your choice. Remember, it's an investment in your health!
Root Canal. The real question you need to ask yourself is: what is my long-term goal and expectation? Having a root canal is a fine option. However, it does weaken the tooth and it's long-term prognosis becomes less favorable. If you can do the root canal and have no problem paying for the implant if/when that tooth fails, go for the root canal! Otherwise, go right for the implant! Keep smiling!
Depends. You need to consider how long will the tooth last following a root canal procedure. If it will not last more than five years then you may wish to consider a dental implant to avoid the cost of root canal then the cost of an extraction when it fails followed by the placement of a dental implant.
Depends. You really need to see a dentist who can evaluate your specific case. There are many variables...
Depends. If a root canal is done then a post and crown is needed in most cases. If its a short tooth then you may need gum surgery called crown lengthening. Pitting all that together an implant may cost less. Less procedures involved etc. Ask you r dentist to compare the costs for you as all doctors have different fees.
It depends. As with all options for treating a particular problem, much of what ultimately is "cheaper" depends on the conditions involved. All things being equal, initially it is cheaper with root canal treatment if there are no complicating factors such as shape of the canals, accessory canals, cracks in the tooth, periodontal condition, integrity of remaining tooth structure and completeness of the seal.
Short term. A root canal itself will cost about 1/4 to 1/3 the total cost of an implant replacement. Remember a root canaled tooth usually needs a crown, so that will increase the total cost. Both are predictable procedures.
Root canal. The root canal could be 50% cheaper than the implant.
Long term= implants! While endodontic /root canal therapy is considered a less costly treatment modality for a tooth whose nerve has been irreversibly damaged, depending on the extent and the cause of the damage, the placement of a dental implant may have superior long term prognosis ; economy. This particularly applies to teeth cracked down the middle and teeth that have little or no natural structure remaining.
Expensive. Usually you need both.
Dental implant. Root canal is cheaper than dental implant. However, one should look at the longevity of the treatment. If root canal can provide long-term solution for the tooth then that's the route to take. However, if it provides only a short-term cure then one should look at the alternatives.
Can be close. All things considered, the implant treatment is more expensive. If you add the cost of the root canal treatment and the post core buildup and the crown and compare it to the cost of the extraction plus the implant surgery plus the implant crown, you will usually find the implant treatment to be about $ 500 - 1000 more. However, the first is building on an already broken down foundation.
Dental implant. Your main objective should be the longevity of each of the option. If root canal can save your tooth for a long time then that's the best plan. However, if the tooth has a short life expectancy even with the root canal then dental implant is the treatment of choice. It is more expensive but will give you service for a long time. So ask your dentist as to the long-term prognosis of each option.
Cheaper or Better? I believe that most doctors would agree that the decision between root canal and implant is not necessarily based on cost. When indicated saving your natural tooth is the "best", least costly procedure. However if the tooth is severely compromised and has a guarded long term prognosis it might be "cheaper" to extract and replace it. Check with your dds to determine the whats best for you.
Dental implants can take 9 months. During this time some other crown or root canal problem happens. Not good. Why so long for bone graft to get solid?
Bone grafts. It is what it is. Bone integration takes the body 4-6 months at least for enough integration to minimize chance of failure. Bone grafting around implant takes less but sufficient time needed. Other conditions such as irreversible inflammation of nerve of tooth, decay just don't take as long. Other procedures such as RCT or crowns take 1-2 visits generally. See comment below:
I've been advised to have two teeth extracted and then have implants for replacements. Should I try to save them? One tooth has a root canal but there is a pocket of something at the base of the root. The tooth is loose but still functions. The other I
Without. Without viewing the teeth in question and proper radiographs, it is difficult to determine the long term prognosis of the teeth involved. At some point, the teeth may reach a point where it is no longer feasible to fix. You need a good foundation to build upon. Tooth mobility can indicate significant amounts of bone loss which may deem the tooth as "hopeless". Also, if the crowned tooth has recurrent decay, an new crown could be made if there is sufficient sound tooth structure remaining and, depending on the amount of decay, may require root canal therapy. However, the long term prognosis must be evaluated. I prefer to give the example of a bald tire. When it begins to wear out, you can patch it, plug it, or retread it. However, at some point, a new tire is the safest and best option. What you don't want to happen is spend $$$ on patching the tooth only to lose it within the near future.
I. I understand that you would rather save your natural tooth rather than have an extraction. From your description of that particular tooth, it seems your problem is a periodontal one here and there may be no other solution than an extraction and implant. The tooth that you wish to save is the crowned molar with decay at the base. I do not think this is a root canal problem either. If I there is enough tooth left after the decay is removed, you might be able to place another crown. Before I would do any treatment, since all of this is costly, I would consult with a periodontist and an endodontist and see what they have to say. They are specialists in this area and would let you know what the problem is and whether patching up a tooth with decay that already has a crown will work, or is it wasting money, because in the end, it will have to be extracted and replaced. The loose tooth, I would assume, will only get looser and you will need an implant because that is the only solution when you have perio disease which you need to get under control. Get the consultatiions from the specialists and make an informed decision you can live with.
It. It sounds as if it is not a root canal problem, but a peridontal issue. Choosing to remove the tooth and placing an implant often times offers the best prognosis rather than trying to save a very damaged tooth. Did you have this conversation with your dentist?
First. First of, all without a proper examination and x-rays it will be difficult to answer your questions with precision. But for better prognosis and assuming your periodontal condition is optimal, the tooth that has a root canal and a pocket pocket, I would recommend to extract it and place and implant for a more predictable future for your tooth and your investment. The other tooth that is crowned I would recommend a root canal treatment, a build up and a cerec porcelain crown. On both instances I would get an opinion from an endodontist, and if the last tooth will have a poor prognosis, the extraction and placement of another implant will be indicated. Good luck!
Sounds reasonable. If you are not sure, see a prosthodontist. They are specialists in this area. At some point, root canaled teeth have a limited life span. It is better to save the bone and place the implant than keep the tooth, only to lose it later, and have lost alot of bone along the way.
Extract. When you are advised to have teeth extracted, after they have had root canal therapy, when there is evidence of bone destruction and tooth looseness is causing further bone loss, then it's time.
Implants. If you have questions about the options presented by your dentist then a second opinion by a periodontist may answer your remaining questions. As dentists we look at the long term prognosis of the teeth. You have noted some problems around the teeth that indicate bone loss. There needs to be good gone to place implants so do not wait until the bone is completely degenerated before the implants.
Dental Advice. The decision to extract teeth is based on radiographic appearance and clinical condition of the questionable teeth. Trying to save teeth that are deemed hopeless will ultimately result in a waste of time and money. Get a second opinion from a local periodontist, someone who can actually see the teeth and radiographs. Then you can proceed with a clear mind.
A root canal is necessary on a tooth next to one that is holding a bridge of 6 teeth. Both teeth on either side of the bridge have to be extracted and implants will be put in. What do I do first?
DENTIST WILL. .. The dentist taking care of you should be able to tell you that. I would think extraction first then implants, but. I'm not the dentist.
RCT. I would do the root canal first to be sure there is no untreated source of infection before the implants are placed. Consult your dentist.
Treatment plan. This needs to be determined by the dentist treating you based upon your specific circumstances. Is the tooth infected? Are you in pain? Is the bridge a front or back one? There are many ways to address these issues and no one "right" answer.
Root canal first? Most treatment plans would suggest a root canal first on a infected tooth that adjoins a potential implant site. It is possible that this tooth may need to be extracted too and more implants placed and/or it's infection may hamper the placement of implants or bone grafts for future implants. All bets are off if this is in the smile zone. Then your dentist will have to deal with esthetics too.
Root canal first. The root canal should be done first because one of the few reasons that implants fail to integrate is an infection next to the surgical site. You obviously want to maximize the success of your dental treatment, so root canal first followed by your implant placement.