9 doctors weighed in:
What are chances of spot in mammogram being cancer?
9 doctors weighed in

Dr. Barry Rosen
Surgery
6 doctors agree
In brief: CHECK BIRADS
Radiologists have adopted a common language to describe mammographic abnormalities, called the birads system (you will see this on your report).
A birads 3 abn has a 0.5% risk and is closely watched. A birads 4 (15-30%) or 5 (50-75%) abn should be biopsied to determine if it's a cancer. Birads 0 means that further eval is needed (ultrasound, comparison to prior mamms, etc). I hope this helps!

In brief: CHECK BIRADS
Radiologists have adopted a common language to describe mammographic abnormalities, called the birads system (you will see this on your report).
A birads 3 abn has a 0.5% risk and is closely watched. A birads 4 (15-30%) or 5 (50-75%) abn should be biopsied to determine if it's a cancer. Birads 0 means that further eval is needed (ultrasound, comparison to prior mamms, etc). I hope this helps!
Dr. Barry Rosen
Dr. Barry Rosen
Thank
2 comments
Dr. Carl Decker
BIRADS 3 is said to have a <2% risk of being cancerous per BIRADS lexicon.
Dr. Michael Gabor
BIRADS 4 is 2-95% risk of cancer, and BIRADS 5 is > 95%
Dr. Michael Gabor
Diagnostic Radiology
In brief: Probability of Ca
Nodules are characterized on mammo by various features that increase or decrease the probability of cancer.
In order to remain accredited to interpret mammo, radiologists are required to render a final interpretation categorizing the lesion into one of the following categories: benign, probably benign, suspicious, or highly suspicious. The last category implies at least a 95% chance of malignancy

In brief: Probability of Ca
Nodules are characterized on mammo by various features that increase or decrease the probability of cancer.
In order to remain accredited to interpret mammo, radiologists are required to render a final interpretation categorizing the lesion into one of the following categories: benign, probably benign, suspicious, or highly suspicious. The last category implies at least a 95% chance of malignancy
Dr. Michael Gabor
Dr. Michael Gabor
Thank
Dr. Andrew Turrisi
Radiation Oncology
In brief: It's actually
A poor test with too many false positives (finds things that are not cancer) and false negatives (fails to find things that are due to dense breasts, small size) once it finds something, the follow up is u/s to guide biopsy, then MRI to look for other lesions.
..A slow, inaccurate, costly process begging to be improved.

In brief: It's actually
A poor test with too many false positives (finds things that are not cancer) and false negatives (fails to find things that are due to dense breasts, small size) once it finds something, the follow up is u/s to guide biopsy, then MRI to look for other lesions.
..A slow, inaccurate, costly process begging to be improved.
Dr. Andrew Turrisi
Dr. Andrew Turrisi
Thank
Get help from a real doctor now
Dr. Crystal Twynham
Board Certified, Surgery
29 years in practice
937K people helped
Continue
107,000 doctors available
Read more answers from doctors