Gestational surrogacy at 43 better than risking own health?

Not necessarily. The age of 43 is not a contraindication necessarily to pregnancy. However, if there are underlying medical problems or reproductive health issues then surrogates may be the best option.

Related Questions

What is the definition or description of: gestational surrogacy?

Gestational surrogacy. Gestational surrogacy is when a woman carries a child conceived through in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer from another couple. The embryo originates from the couple egg and sperm. This normally occurs when the wife of the couple has a uterine abnormality that prevents her from carrying the pregnancy. Read more...
See below. This is when someone else carries the pregnancy for you. Read more...

What is Gestational Surrogacy cost in India?

Less expensive. One family had several. The cost for all three children was about $50,000 compared to an estimated $100,000 a child in the United States. And the Indian women who carried the pregnancies, who typically earn about $60 a month, each received the equivalent of $6,000. Read more...

Gestational surrogacy--sick of hearing about rich nyc career women hiring poor women in rural america. Anyone?

Can't judge. I imagine the couple is more interested in a healthy surrogate. It so happens that candidates in poorer areas may be more willing or interested in being a surrogate. If both parties benefit, i see no harm. Read more...

Can I do gestational surrogacy after tubes tied and novasure ablation?

Surrogacy. If you have had an endometrial ablation where the uterine lining is destroyed then it would be almost impossible to carry a pregnancy. You may be able to donate eggs but with the lining scarred then there is not any possibility of pregnancy. Read more...